Regarding the following:
Amazing, simply amazing. In the breast cancer study below, they even admit that a woman having a full term birth lowers her risk of breast cancer, then in the next breath they say that an abortion does not increase the risk of breast cancer.
The last I heard is that when you have an abortion, the woman can no longer have a full term birth, because the pregnancy is OVER.
Then they have the guts to say that women were followed for an average of 6.6 years. Surely, they must know that 6.6 years is nothing. It could be 20 years or more for clinical signs of breast cancer to appear.
Here's the "kicker," even the NCI (National Cancer Institute) and the ACS (American Cancer Society) say that one out of seven women will develop breast cancer during their lifetime. Using the researchers own figures, they studied 267,361 women and 4805 developed breast cancer, this is only about one out of fifty five. Well below the national average of one out of seven. Something's wrong.
If I were a betting person, I would bet that this study was funded by the Abortion Industry. It makes absolutely no sense at all. Actually, it doesn't even pass the smell test.
The American people should be able to decide this on their own. All they have to know is this, which can be understood by a ten-year old:
When pregnancy occurs, there is a SURGE of this ESTROGEN (2,000%) causing the breast cells to proliferate dramatically in the first trimester, in order to lay the foundation for the production of milk. These young growing cells are more prone to develop cancer.
In the second half of pregnancy, the estrogen levels RECEDE under the influence of such hormones as human placental lactogen. The immature cells, then grow and differentiate rapidly into mature, specialized milk producing tissue. Once specialization has occurred, the cells are less likely to turn cancerous.
When the pregnancy is terminated by an induced abortion, these young growing cells (known as undifferentiated cells), and having undergone drastic changes are now in LIMBO.
They are no longer normal breast cells, nor are they capable of producing milk.
In plain English, these insulted cells (traumatized) have been hung out to dry. They are between a rock and a hard place. Scientists have known for years that any cell in the human body that has been traumatized, whether by chemicals, radiation, micro- trauma, or any other reason would be especially vulnerable to cancer.
One must then surmise that what has been instilled in physicians heads from time immemorial, regarding the vulnerability of abnormal cells, is no longer valid. To suit their political agenda, they would have you believe that an abnormal cell is NO more prone to becoming cancerous than a normal cell. This defies all scientific knowledge, as well as common sense and shows the depths they will go, to keep the abortion industry flourishing. Human life means nothing to them.
It has also been long known that a pregnancy carried to term protects against breast cancer. However, if a woman has an induced abortion, this protection is terminated.
The reason is because the proliferation of the undifferentiated, cancer vulnerable cells, by the estrogen secreted early in the pregnancy, no longer has the protection that comes from hormones released later in pregnancy, since the pregnancy has been aborted.
The estrogen/breast cancer risk has been known by doctors for many years, thus their reluctance to prescribe estrogen for menopausal women, especially those with any family history of breast cancer. Manufacturers of oral contraceptives alert the public as to the possible link between their product and breast cancer. The induced abortion risk is greater than the relative risk associated with oral contraceptives.
Frank Joseph MD